Navigating the Supreme Court: Hernandez v. Mesa

This chapter explores the complexities of arguing liberal positions before a conservative Supreme Court, focusing on the Hernandez v. Mesa case. It critiques Justice Alito's majority opinion and addresses discrepancies in the court's treatment of facts and procedural standards, particularly regarding a controversial shooting incident. The discussion further examines the implications of the Bivens doctrine and the challenges individuals face in seeking justice against federal officials.