The Supreme Court Leaker Leaked the Dobbs Decision

I have an unwritten rule that if you have a proposed reform for an institution, the first question is what would this reform do to my own institution? And I understand government is different, monopoly on violence and tax power. But like, there is not a sane editor of a major publication in the world that would say, "We should live stream all of our editorial" It's funny how people can change their perspective, their common sense when it applies to someone at an institution outside of their coalition or their interest. There are things that I would rather not know. You just have to accept a certain amount of mystery in the world.