Among Signs Is a Criterion

The section you're talking about west is on one forty one. Its one 13 57 b. At the very top there, he says that while some of the premises from which anthemedes are stated are things necessarily, so most are things that are so for the most part. And anthemees are based on likelihoods and signs. So it is necessary for the former pair to be the same as the latter then this whole ion is exactly what you described now. Some signs are related as particularly universal, some are related as the converse of that. The necessary sign is a criterion, but the non necessary kind has no name to indicate the difference.