The Rules of the Matrix

If reality isn't subject to experiential evidence, then what you're saying is you know that nothing can be known and nothing can be rationally justified. So the reality that I experience is remarkably consistent and remarkably testable. And so there are a number of claims that I can test and as long as the test is repeatable, then we can pretty much conclude that that is true because it's in accordance with reality. But intuition on the other hand is also testable, but it's testable and does not show a good valid pathway to truth. You cannot intuit yourself into understanding quantum physics, for instance. The problem of hard-solved system is how do you show