The Sign of Desire Is Never a Sign of the Law

You can't even make the whole of lacanisma line with itself. Yeme delus has his own way of problmatizing the signifying logic of sense, which i leave to aside for now. But he doesn't go half as far as gatri who is really interested in the a signifying n a subjective aspect of assemblages of the unconscious, of desire. And this is why, im one 11, they say, from the moment desire is welded again to the law, we needn't point out what is known since time began,. That there is no desire without law. This is like a licanian commonplace. Yes, the eternal operation of eternal repression