The Utilitarian Approach to Animal Suffering

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Do you think that groups like PETA adopt a kind of utilitarian way of thinking about animal suffering as opposed to a more rights-based viewpoint? For me, it just seems very obvious. The same amount of utility in a mouse or a human is of equal moral value. But there's some people who don't believe that they think that even if, let's say a chimp can suffer a broken leg as much as a human does, we still should treat humans better.

Read the full transcript here.

How can we form good habits more effectively? What roles do reward and punishment play in the habit formation process? And what roles should they play? How should we structure our daily schedules around new habits to maximize the likelihood that they'll stick? If our goal is to do 100 push-ups a day, it's often easier to start with 10 and increase the difficulty over time; but at what level of difficulty should we start, and how quickly should we approach the target difficulty? How does willpower connect (or not) with habit formation? Why should we care about animal consciousness? When it comes to estimating how much good specific interventions will do, are bad estimates better than no estimates at all?

Dr. Jim Davies is a professor of cognitive science at Carleton University. He is the author of Imagination: The Science of Your Mind's Greatest Power; Riveted: The Science of Why Jokes Make us Laugh, Movies Make us Cry, and Religion Makes us Feel One with the Universe; and Being the Person Your Dog Thinks You Are: The Science of a Better You. He co-hosts (with Dr. Kim Hellemans) the award-winning podcast Minding the Brain. Learn more about him at jimdavies.org or follow him on Twitter or Facebook.

Staff