Liberalism

i don't actually to misery with liberalism as an idea. I only disagree with it because it is the status quo. Which is why i say, you can either go against it, or you can accelerate it - but you can't accept it as it is. The more i define liberalism, the more vantage points one has to attack. My ideas because i am defining them. That's why i try to not define extremism, acentrism, a liberalism, technocracy, corporara, corporarity and a corporatism. Am and  because the more i talk about it, themore it's revealed that am r is no longer accurate. So that's why i'm going