If it's completely speculative, or it's already been debunked, or there's a major piece of context missing, who do they give it to? Stephan calls tem. So get to know the actual individuals. If you thought that maggie haberman was a source of actual news,. You need to learn who the players are, right? The some people who are more close to a punch line. That's closer to a joke than it is to news. I don't see it in the datasentencs telling you that they are. Oh, you twov, just lost my connection. But you're back, right? A. What else we got going on here? That's
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
- Wrap-Up Smear tactic per Nancy Pelosi
- AG Garland authorized Mar-a-Lago raid
- Did Trump people get a copy of the warrant?
- WaPo's 2 anonymous sources
- Nuclear weapons secrets, really...really?
- How CNN launders FAKE NEWS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support