Why the State Shouldn't Discriminate

6min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The state itself was discriminatory. That kind of established a culture of this. And therefore, it seems to me that would be an argument for the state to come in and say, you can't do this. You know, we screwed up. We shouldn't have been doing this for centuries, and and we did. This is not like a political ideology. It's just part of your corps being that you didn't choose. The inclusion of blacks in what i would call the sovereign mass was a grand reparate reparative moement. Short of really no stepping on the rights of a free people and going towards a bloated totalitarian state, there isn't anything more that we can demand of

In this conversation with Jason Hill based on his book What do White Americans Owe Black People? Racial Justice in the Age of Post-Oppression, Shermer probes the philosopher on the arguments for and against reparations.

In this provocative and highly original work, philosophy professor Jason Hill explores multiple dimensions of race in America today, but most importantly, a black-white divide which has grown exponentially over the past decade.

Central to his thesis, Hill calls on black American leaders (and their white liberal sponsors) to escape from the cycle of blame and finger-pointing, which seeks to identify black failures with white hatred and indifference. This overblown narrative is promulgated by a phalanx of black nihilists who advocate the destruction of America and her institutions in the name of ending “whiteness.” Much of the black intelligentsia consists of these false prophets, and it is their poisonous ideology which is taught, uncontradicted, to students of all races. It is they who are responsible for the cultural depression blacks are suffering in today’s society.

Ultimately, the answer to “what do White Americans owe?” is not about the morality or practicality of reparations, affirmative action, or other redistributionist schemes. Hill rejects the collectivist premise behind the argument, instead couching notions of culpability, justice, and fairness as responsibilities of individuals, not arbitrary racial or ethnic groupings.