Is There a Type One Aligamer?

4min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Ocasso: It doesn't seem clear to me how the results could be unaffected by manipulated images. A forensic analyst who looked at the images for charles said that she wouldn't trust any paper that had altered images. Ocasso: There is no consensus on what to do when this happens. Some people think you just throw the whole thing out and start all over again.

This past July, a bombshell report in Science magazine suggested that a key Alzheimer’s study might have contained manipulated evidence. What does this mean for over a decade's worth of research? And where does the field go from here?

For more, go to http://vox.com/unexplainable

It’s a great place to view show transcripts and read more about the topics on our show.

Also, email us! unexplainable@vox.com

We read every email.

Support Unexplainable by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices