The Data Driven Approach to Classifying Cognitively Normal Individuals With MC I

The data driven approach also seem to classify a lot more participants with m c i than the consensus approach. And as a result, your data shows that this cohort or cluster analysis approach labelled 66 % of participants who progressed to dimensions m c i at base line. But for those of us in practice, we could conclude it's a bad thing if we're incorrectly labelling cognitively normal individuals as being cognitively impaired. How many participants were classified by the cluster analysis as impaired but didn't actually progress to dimench over the follow up period? So this is the challenge, right? Because we want to develop methods that do capture people early in the disease process,. n especially for the purpose of