Some historians argue that this country could have stayed neutral in 1914. But the dominating instincts of Germany's leadership were hardly been moderated by triumph in 1914. They didn't go to war with a grand plan for world domination, but soon after war had broken out they identified massive territorial rewards as their price for granting an armistice to the Allies. To believe that Britain could and should have acquiesced in a German triumph in 1914 requires one to believe in the moderation and generosity of Germany's rulers as some of us cannot.
For this week's Sunday Debate, we're dipping back into the archive to 2014, when we gathered a panel of expert historians to debate whether Britain was right to fight in the First World War, a tragedy that laid the foundations for decades of destructive upheaval and violence across Europe. To debate the issue, we invited leading historians Margaret MacMillan, Max Hastings, John Charmley and Dominic Sandbrook to an event hosted by journalist, columnist and national security expert, Edward Lucas.
We’d love to hear your feedback and what you think we should talk about next, who we should have on and what our future debates should be about. Send us an email or voice note with your thoughts to podcasts@intelligencesquared.com.
At Intelligence Squared we’ve got our own online streaming platform, Intelligence Squared+ and we’d love you to give it a go. It’s packed with more than 20 years’ worth of video debates and conversations on the world’s most important topics as well as exclusive podcast content. Tune in to live events, ask your questions or watch on-demand, totally ad-free with hours of discussion to dive into. Visit intelligencesquaredplus.com to start watching today.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices