Computer Simulation of a Pandamic

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Computer simulations of pandemics often fail to anticipate human behavior. The first time we did this, we had eight thousand people. The next time, 20 thousand people. We're living through other complicating factors like supply chain disruptions or misinformation theories spreading on social media. As the game unfolds, all you have to do is tell us what you would do, what you would feel and how you would try tohel others. And if we can ask you questions, just give us your intuitive response based on what you know about yourself.

The future grows out of the present, but it manages to consistently surprise us. How can we get better at anticipating and preparing for what the future can be like? Jane McGonigal started out as a game designer, working on the kinds of games that represent miniature worlds with their own rules. This paradigm provides a useful way of thinking about predicting the future: imagining changes in the current world, then gaming out the consequence, allowing real people to produce unexpected emergent outcomes. We talk about the lessons learned that anyone can use to better prepare their brain for the future to come.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Jane McGonigal received her Ph.D. in performance studies from the University of California, Berkeley. She is currently a writer and Director of Games Research and Development at the Institute for the Future. She teaches a course at Stanford on How to Think Like a Futurist. She has developed several games, including SuperBetter, a game she designed to improve health and resilience after suffering from a concussion. Her recent book is Imaginable: How to See the Future Coming and Feel Ready for Anything–Even Things That Seem Impossible Today.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.