Is There a Difference Between Humanism and Philosophy Intelligence?

In the book, you call for philosophy intelligence as a historical project. The idea that we may not be able to recognize intelligence as it does not come in our own image is at the root of your argument. You say there are levelso reasoning and models which help us understand how the universe is - but they can also simulate what might happen if we make interventions. I love this m it's like, i think may be one of the last sentences in the book: 'Qu granting computationa reasoning due recognition as a distinct logos' It was originally rese's kind of rationalist programme to kick off philosophy intelligence. Brese has kind of abandoned the idea in that he thinks it feeds too much