Exploring the Complexities of Race-Based Policies and Neo-Racism

23min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The chapter delves into the implications of race-based policies, discussing the jurisprudential framework surrounding them and debating whether they should be completely eliminated. It also challenges the concept of neo-racism, highlighting key fallacies associated with it like the disparity fallacy and emphasizing evidence-based approaches to combat racism. The discussion advocates for a colorblind upbringing and aggressive measures to address racial discrimination in society.

Yascha Mounk and Coleman Hughes discuss the difference between race blindness and racism blindness.

Coleman Hughes is a writer and the host of Conversations with Coleman. His new book is The End of Race Politics: Arguments for a Colorblind America.

In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Coleman Hughes discuss why race is a poor proxy for setting public policy; why being colorblind doesn’t mean disregarding one’s own cultural affinities; and how we can continue to make progress against racial discrimination without making the concept of race ever more central to our culture and politics.

This transcript has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.

Please do listen and spread the word about The Good Fight.

If you have not yet signed up for our podcast, please do so now by following this link on your phone.

Email: podcast@persuasion.community

Website: http://www.persuasion.community

Podcast production by Jack Shields, and Brendan Ruberry

Connect with us!

Spotify | Apple | Google

Twitter: @Yascha_Mounk & @joinpersuasion

Youtube: Yascha Mounk

LinkedIn: Persuasion Community

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices