The Role of Social Science in the Pandemic

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Sally Kohn: Do you think social scientists helped significantly with the pandemic? She says they were able to make things go better than they would have, but not in a "grand success" Kohn: Early learning about what kind of lockdown policies were most effective involved economics as much as it did public health. But at least in the public press where you were seeing social scientists comment on COVID, I actually felt that a lot of the contributions were anti-helpful.

Read the full transcript here.

What makes studying humans harder than studying other parts of the universe? Is social science currently improving its rigor, relevance, and self-reflection? Is it improving its predictive power over time? Why have sample sizes historically been so small in social science studies? Is social science actually able to accumulate knowledge? Have social scientists been able to move the "needle" on real-world problems like vaccine adoption? Is social science becoming more diverse? Specifically, does social science have a political bias? Are universities in crisis? Do the incentive structures in universities make them difficult or even impossible to reform?

Matt Grossmann is Director of the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research and Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University. He is also Senior Fellow at the Niskanen Center and a Contributor at FiveThirtyEight. He has published analysis in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico, and hosts the Science of Politics podcast. He is the author or co-author of How Social Science Got Better, Asymmetric Politics, Red State Blues, The Not-So-Special Interests, Artists of the Possible, and Campaigns & Elections, as well as dozens of journal articles. You can find more about him on his website.

Staff