The Ethics of Zoophilia

16min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The hosts delve into a controversial article arguing for the moral permissibility of zoophilia and discuss its implications. They explore the social taboo and stigma associated with zoophilia, compare it to other sexual orientations, and address objections related to harm to animals and consent. The chapter also includes humorous moments and speculation about the author's pseudonym.

The morality of zoophilia has received shockingly little attention in contemporary ethical discourse…until now. David and Tamler break down the paper “Zoophilia is Morally Permissible” from the latest issue of The Journal of Controversial Ideas. We explore issues of harm, consent, and more… like a lot more. Then we talk about Robert Putnam's classic article “Bowling Alone” (the paper that led to his best selling book) about the decline of civic engagement in American life.

Bensto, Fira (Pseudonym) (2023) Zoophilia Is Morally Permissible, Journal of Controversial Ideas, Vol. 3, Issue 2.

Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002.

Luhmann, M., Buecker, S., & Rüsberg, M. (2023). Loneliness across time and space. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(1), 9-23.