Revisiting Legal Precedents and Narrative Contrasts

This week on Secondary Rules, Joshua Neoh and Ryan Goss discuss the theatrical spectacle of Question Time and its constitutional purpose, and activate book club mode to think about why law is like a novel.

• Bovens on accountability (2007)
• Dworkin on Law as Interpretation (1982)
• Cooper v Stuart (1889, UKPC)
• Mabo (No 2) (1992, HCA)

If you're a student in Australian Public Law or Legal Theory this semester, more available on the course WATTLE sites.  

Interested in starting your own law studies or learning more about our legal research? Learn more here.  

Our thanks to Jack O’Brien, Tom Fearon, and the ANU College of Law for their production of the podcast. Our theme music is by Soul Shifters.  

ANU acknowledges and celebrates the First Australians on whose traditional lands we meet, and pays our respect to Elders past and present.