The Self Reflection Problem Isn't an Accident

The self reference problem is denied by every single narro scientist and materialist. It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid. There's a paradox with in logical positivism. You're accepting logic on faith, which is the definition of illogical. How can you prove what counts as valid proof? See, anything you say is a valid proof. And this is gong to be an infinite regress problem because truth is actually a greater notion than proof.