The information ratios nearly doubled from the factor approach and the machine learning approach was walk forward out of sample, while the factor approach had unavoidable in sample bis. When you choose the factor approach over the optimized machine learning approach, you're basically giving up high risk, agested returns for ease of explanation - which is sometimes a mutually beneficial trait. Highacter predicts higher stock returns are related to the underlying characteristic, not the auto correlation. It matters that the highest re-weigh has an effect on expected returns. A feature should drive more expected returns if it is dispersed as it is in linearage. And i should say, there is still an advantage to smart bata, which is easy transparency

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode