The Shadows of Blood Evidence

This chapter explores the intricate world of blood spatter analysis and its implications in the justice system, focusing on the ramifications of subjective interpretations of bloodstains. It highlights case studies, including the wrongful conviction of David Kam and the complex murder investigation of Uta, underscoring systemic flaws in expert testimony. The narrative emphasizes the chilling reality of potential miscarriages of justice stemming from unreliable forensic science.