The social sciences get tricky, but can still be approached scientifically. The right answer isn't simply an empirical question, because it has a lot to do with our value or political preferences. We can look at times in uas history when the tax rates have been different and we can see how the economy did under them. But there is some empirical evidence that can be brought to bear on the question. If scientists are being clear what the consensus claim is then i think, ha, it's a very powerful and important thing for us to know.
In this interview, based on her landmark book, Why Trust Science?, historian of science Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength — and the greatest reason we can trust it. Drawing vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong, Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy.