There are guideposts that the court has traditionally looked at so you know one is just how wrong was that previous decision was it egregiously wrong. The court has traditionally been less willing to overturn a precedent that involves interpreting a statute and the rationale is hey if we got that wrong Congress has the ability to pass a new statute and put it backyou know the way they want it.
The US Supreme Court is wrapping up yet another eventful term, with decisions in major cases that will have a lasting impact on Americans’ lives. Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr and Zoe Tillman join this episode to talk about how in recent years, the high court has become more willing to assert its power and enhance its role among the three branches of government. At the same time, ethics controversies and rising public perception that the justices are sometimes overtly political have lowered confidence in the court.
Read more: An Aggressive Supreme Court Reshapes the US as Its Standing Erodes
Listen to The Big Take podcast every weekday and subscribe to our daily newsletter: https://bloom.bg/3F3EJAK
Have questions or comments for Wes and the team? Reach us at bigtake@bloomberg.net.
* This episode introduction was updated on Friday, 6/30 to reflect the two Supreme Court rulings out Friday morning.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.