It's not that insy, unless you want to know about the brain, and it doesn't actually explain weter, right? And the attitude that it somehow is a better explanation, or the more scientific explanation, is a silly one. It's just a different, it's a different explanation, ferent levels of exelent,. But yes, this kind of confusion happens. So how is hit happening here?
David and Tamler talk about the often rancorous debate among cognitive scientists and evolutionary psychologists over whether the mind is modular -- composed of discrete systems responsible for vision, reasoning, cheater detection, sexual jealousy, and so on. David and Tamler (mostly David) describe the history of the debate, then dive into a recent paper (Pietraszewski & Wertz, 2021) arguing that virtually all the disagreement is the product of a conceptual and methodological confusion – that the two sides are operating with different levels of analysis and talking past each other as a result.
Plus, we REALLY tried not to talk about the University of Austin thing for the whole opening segment. We had another topic lined up and everything. It just didn’t work out. Cicero would understand. Bari Weiss stans might wanna skip to the main segment.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: