Aristotle's Con of Consequence

i'm interested both in what anged and what state. And presumably your point is that you can't just sort of notice the difference tween aristotle and the contemporary concept. If you want to understand the contemporary concept, rather, you have to figure out where the changes were made exactly. You need a narrative, rathe. At least i think it's very useful to have. So start with aristotle. You see what aristotle's con of consequence was and why it was formulated the way it was formed.