Book Review in the Washington Post?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

i can see a world where the paper based delivery mechanism starts to go away, and a newspapers are basically delivering on line. I would like to understand the nature of how they're choosing where to put things. And for example, i mean, increasingly, there was a great article that we should link to a to day. So that doesn't at all raise questions in your mind if you were to book review in the washington post? Ah, that doesn't, that doesn’t change your your feeling about about the quality of that book review. Yes, i think i could be comfortable with that happening.

In this week’s episode we spend a good bit of time revisiting the native ads discussion, then dive into the different ways that Twitter and Facebook have handled the news this week. From there we discuss Twitter’s timeline changes, the realities of venture capital, and whether or not our entire economic system will survive the automation revolution. Yes, it gets deep quickly!

Links

Ben Thompson: Print, Chinese Walls, and “Objective” Journalism – Stratechery (members only)
Clay Shirky: Last Call – Medium
Jay Rosen: When Quoting Both Sides and Leaving it There is the Riskier Call – PressThink
Hamilton Nolan: Time Inc. Rates Writers on How “Beneficial” They Are to Advertisers – Gawker
Derek Willis: New Republican Leader Finds New Friends, and Quick Cash – New York Times
Marco Arment: I’ll Never Fly Amazon Again – Marco.org
Ben Thompson: Twitter is Great for Unprofitable News – Stratechery (members-only)
Mathew Ingram: Twitter vs. Facebook as a news source – GigaOm
Matt Buchanan: The Twitter of Tomorrow – New Yorker
Humans Need Not Apply – YouTube