i think we're ju nn our wheels here. I think we should focus on the case of the drunk driving case, which is very useful and brings out virtually every element here that's worth talking about. And i just, i would want to hear tamler, for instance. Here's a question for you. If it was just true to say, and this is now pushing on your claim that you're not a consequentialist, what if it's just a fact that you would be better off? Why do you still deserve that beat down? Ye? We aways.
Sam Harris gets back in the VBW ring for another round on moral responsibility, ethical theories, and the grounds for our obligations to other people. Are we at a genuine stalemate when it comes to blame and desert? Is Tamler a closet consequentialist? Is Sam a closet pluralist? Why is Dave such a big Wagner fan? Plus, Twitter shaming: what is it good for? Settle in, get comfortable, pour yourself a drink, you’re in for the long haul on this one.
Links
Special Guest: Sam Harris.
Support Very Bad Wizards