Analyzing Supreme Court Arguments on Criminal Prosecution of Former Presidents and Implications for Future Presidencies

Former President Trump's lawyers argued before the US Supreme Court that the President ought to be broadly immune against misdeeds committed in office, even many that are clearly criminal. The Supreme Court is now weighing where to draw the lines both for this former President and future former Presidents. Clark Neily discusses the oral argument at the high court.

---

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.