So i'm going to talk about this in a similar way, but but with, i read with my red glasses on. So the problems in the text, right can be a a problem that could be addressed with copy editing or proof reading rigt the a. They could be at that level that, you know, where everything else is working, but there are few words out of place. But of course, words that are not working, sentences that are not working, can also be a sign of a problem that's upstream, and meaning that we have to go to a higher level of analysis. So i was thinking about this, and i was thinking about, will you need a way to tell the difference? And so when i, when i looked at the the manuscript that we have for to day, i was thinking about, well, if you have multiple problems at the beat level, then you want to go up to the tropes. If you have trouble in the tropes, then you want to go up to the scene of an synthesis, or the five commandments and and look there. And if you've trouble with them, you go up to the narrative device. And if you have trouble with the narrative device, you discover a problem there, then you move up to the the pop the that proposition of possibility where we're looking at the context, the protagonist, the inciting incident and the goal. So allf those things, when you've got a problem, if it's just one little problem, or it's, you know, only happening every so often at a certain level, then you can address it at that level, but if you've got more then you want to go up. And you've got to keep going up until you find where the real problem is, right? Which is very similar to what the protagonist has to do, right? The inciting incident happens, there's an aspect of that they can't see. And so they have to keep trying, pursuing their goal until the turning point, progressive complication happens when they make sense of of what that inciting incident aw, so that's the same kind of thing. When we spot problems in the manuscript, we've got to keep moving until we figure out what level we're talking about.