Do You Understand Facticity Versus Factuality?

i think this section here, he's also trying to create the new category that only applies to dasin. So somehow capital f, fact or facticity, is us, and factical is the world, just like theirs, existence and essence. And oh oacticity is like the active form of aa. Therefore applies to azin what factuality is for the stone. The actuality of the stone is its objective presence, its presence at hand. But dosin understands its own most being in the sense of a certain kind of actual objective presence. It feels as if we have same type of factual, objective presence as the stone, but in fact it's something a bit different