There's a famous argument. Maybe this is a good place to start, the consequence argument against free will. And you have a very nice summary of it in your book. So for philosophers listening to the podcast, they'll note that there are much more complicated versions of it. I'd like the very simplest one because I think it gets the persuasive force of the argument comes out most clearly. The argument goes like this: If the world is deterministic, the laws of nature together with the initial conditions of the universe determine our actions,. Therefore our actions are not under our control. But we can still make decisions and have an effect on the world.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode