Haskell and Modularity

The modularity in a camel is very similar to that. It kind of affects what language features you can reasonably put in the language or at the very least it affects the design of those languages. So I would say both. The next ML should not have no module system. That's my opinion. Like, I certainly, so the most recent thing that looks vaguely ML-ish is probably Rust.Rust's original compiler was written in a camel and has some experience with MLs when they wrote it. You can see some of that coming through in some of the language design but it lacks a module system. And so maybe the next ML didn't have a module system, but I think that