i get very suspicious. It seems you're rejecting an empirical claim on methodological grounds. You don't like arguments that postulate barriers to human knowledge. Furthermore, you strongly believe in a many worlds view. Write so classic single world determinism does not restrict what happens. So the multi verse as a whole, and human beings within it, across every possible variable, have maximum freedom. And thus, you are the maximum philosopher of freedom, in a sense, with no rival. What do you say? But i think that's rather a contrived way of of putting it. I think for a start there have been sophisticated theories of freedom,. There's john stuart mill and locke and

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode