In the us Constitution, as originally written, we have a very, very simple and beautiful means of constructing what i would call a crude, accountable monarchy. How does this now transpose to government? So, so wee got to get the co plus board situation. The constitution identifies the three branches of government as co equal. It does not say which gets to supervise the other. And it is certainly a on. You know, the founders expected congress to be passing laws, not to be micro managing the executive branch.
Former computer programmer and political theorist Curtis Yarvin is considered by many to be a dangerous thinker. He has been named in the New York Times and Vanity Fair as a founding member of the burgeoning 'New Right' and caused a stir on Tucker Carlson.
His theories of power seem to have made their way from the fringe blogosphere into the mainstream media. Now, people are trying to make sense of some of what Yarvin wants for the Western nations he criticises and where his thinking might go next.
One particularly bold claim made by Yarvin is that America would be better run as a monarchy, rather than a democracy.
To dig deeper into this esoteric political philosophy, Freddie Sayers invited Curtis Yarvin to the UnHerd studio.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.