Capturing Christianity Podcast cover image

CC029: The Argument from Contingency - Josh Rasmussen Ph.D. & Lance Hannestad

Capturing Christianity Podcast

00:00

The Infinite Regress Doesn't Remove the Need for an Explanation

The need for an explanation would apply to multiple things, rather than just individual things. This is because we never find any kind of chaos of contingent things existing without an explanation. And so i'm thinking a cause will be any sort of condition that can play some role in explaining the effects. But it's not clear to me that if we're talking about causation a, the same problem occurs.

Transcript
Play full episode

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app