The Differences Between AMR and Semantic Dependencies

I was thinking that maybe AMR and semantic dependencies are much more linguistic or tied to the words in the utterance that you get. They're more lexical. There's almost a one-to-one mapping. You could go backwards. But then I remembered actually semantic parsing has its roots in CCG, combinatorial, chadagorial, grammar and other things which were a lot more tied. And also you mentioned like directly executable. Is this directly executable enough? It is true that once you have an application at the end, then sometimes you have to be more faithful to the actual application.