Is Chemical Reality Fundamental to Morality?

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

On the one hand, morality is completely tied to the physical situation in some very real sense. But on the other hand, it is absolutely fundamental and necessary to describe what's going on. Think about chemistry, for instance: You might say chemical reality is not fundamental because whenever you've got a molecule of hydrogen, for instance, you've got an arrangement of atomic material or subatomic material. If that's sufficient to show that moral features are non-fundamental, I can live with that if that's your conception of fundamentality. WhatI want to insist on is that what it is to be something like to be morally admirable or to be morally required is not a physical thing. It

Despite occasional and important disagreements, most people are in rough agreement about what it means to be moral, to do the right thing. There’s much less agreement about why we should be moral, or even what kind of answer to that question could be convincing. Philosopher Russ Shafer-Landau is one of the leading proponents of moral realism — the view that objective moral truths exist independently of human choices. That’s not my own view, but ethics and meta-ethics are areas in which I think it’s wise to keep an open mind and listen to smart people who disagree. This conversation offers food for thought for people on either side of this debate.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Russ Shafer-Landau received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Arizona. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Among his numerous books are Moral Realism: A Defense and Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? He is the editor of Oxford Studies in Metaethics, and is the founder and organizer of the annual Madison Metaethics Workshop.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.