The participatory knowing is setting all of these constraints very, very implicitly. But also very, very powerfully, on how our prospectibl knowing needs to con needs to configure it. And e toads makes great use of that. Because if the prospectivl knowing is out of sink, in your example, with the participatory knowing, what does prospectival knowing give you? It gives you the situational awareness so you can learn and apply your skill. So i think did that make sense of your example? That's how i would analyze it.
John Vervaeke answers questions live. This is the first in a series of live Q&As with Future Thinkers podcast guests.
Participation in the discussion is exclusive to Future Thinkers Premium Members. If you want to become a Member, go to http://members.futurethinkers.org/ and get access to our in-depth courses in personal evolution, private group calls, podcast extras, Q&A's with prominent thinkers, and more.
Check out our Watch Parties and Discussions of John Vervaeke's Awakening from the Meaning Crisis lecture series on YouTube.
Future Thinkers previous interview with John Vervaeke: http://www.futurethinkers.org/98
Enter our contest at http://www.futurethinkers.org/giveaway and win 6 months worth of Premium Membership, as well as 1 month supply of Qualia Nootropic Energy from Neurohacker Collective.