There's not a single bit of evidence consistent with the theory that he wanted people to cheat. And there's every evidence that he wanted them to find out if there had been cheating. So am I wrong, am I suffering for some kind of reverse TDS where I'm excusing or putting the best spin on things? Because I don't think so. If you ask any independent person, let's say if you asked Jonathan Turley or Ellen Dershowitz, I guess you can decide how independent they are. Their legal opinions always seem to me like just legal opinions. They're all nothings.