A lot of discussions I see is this idea of it's a bad thing to recommend or have at all on your platform harmful content. And the example in this Gonzales case, in theory, is ISIS videos. The plaintiffs have not actually made any case that there were actual ISIS videos on YouTube that are relevant here. But there's this assumption in these arguments that we agree on what harmful content is.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode