Seth mascoits recently wrote a piece for persuasion called commercial interests aren't enough to save free speech. In it, he argues that net flicks is defending dave chapel largely because of the financial interest that it has to do so. Of course, liberals can celebrate when profit incentives and the defence of free expression aline like they did this time. But we shouldn't convince ourselves that business interests will always, or even usually, be a sufficient bulwark against iliberalism. And that is why we have to continue making the public case for liberalism. Because ultimately, the only true safeguard against censorship will be a principal commitment to free speech that's embedded in our culture and in our