So here is the difference of near, can iould say approach, is that the each smart contract on near is actually its own shard. Virtually o each contract is, it's almost like its own chain. But we package them physically to shart based on the demand and based on the layout that that carrenti etwork needs. And so this is exactly the same as, you know, if you built like invab too,. Like each record in a data base actually can live on whatever shar depending on a whatever data base needs for its indexing and for for load balancing. So thus is the same idea.
In this week’s episode, Anna talks with Illia from Near and Alex from Aurora about the work they did that lead them to the Near ecosystem and what the connection is between the Aurora project and Near. They also cover what’s new at Near since the last time Illia and Anna spoke, Aurora+, the Rainbow Bridge, and future plans with Near’s sharding system.
Here are some links for this episode:
Check out the Zero Knowledge Podcast Linktree to stay up-to-date on all the ZK-focused channels and events in our ecosystem.
Today’s episode is sponsored by Anoma
Anoma is a suite of protocols that enable self-sovereign coordination. Their unique architecture facilitates the simplest forms of economic coordination such as two parties transferring an asset to each other. As well as more sophisticated ones like an asset agnostic bartering system involving multiple parties without direct “coincidence of wants."
Anoma first fractal instance, Namada is planned for later in 2022, and it focuses on enabling shielded transfers for any assets with a few second transaction latency and near zero fees.
Visit Anoma to learn more!
If you like what we do: