AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Judicial Reflections on Gender-Affirming Care
This chapter discusses the pivotal Supreme Court arguments on gender-affirming care, focusing on the performances of Justices Sotomayor and Jackson. It critically examines Tennessee's law and its constitutional implications, while also exploring the historical parallels to race-based legal arguments. The conversation reflects concerns about a conservative court's approach to LGBTQ+ rights and the potential future of legal battles surrounding gender identity and parental rights.