i think people are deploring an intuitive concept of evil that they might not have a theory about, but our theories should most definitely don't. It's just unintuitive to call every person who does harm is e is like evil. But none the less, there structure to what they say. And what we want to do is uncover that structure. In that structure, he thinks, can't be that evil corresponds to just doing harm,. recause people were djus, totally true, out right.
David and Tamler descend into the dark pits of Hell to look Satan in the eyes and discover the nature of evil. OK…that’s not fully accurate, we just read and talk about a couple of philosophy articles that analyze the concept. What are the features of evil people and acts? Does evil just mean ‘really really really really bad’ or is it categorically different in some way? Can you be evil without ever actually causing harm? Is Tony Soprano evil?
Plus we take a "moral alignment" quiz (inspired by role playing games like Dungeons and Dragons). We both want to end up as ‘chaotic good’ but does it turn out that way? And what kind of character is a unicorn?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: