Derrida's Criticism of Lacon

Derrida's main claim in his, in his retort is that like what Lacon does not do is interrogate. He lays out that there are two scenes which are structurally aligned. Derrida doesn't think that psychoanalysis troubles the position of the analyst. That's in what he thinks. And this, what he gets at in this response is that it's the frame of psychoanalysis that determines what it finds. So for Derrida, Lacon's deficit is in not troubling the narrator at all. It's a pretty good, I think Derrida's essay is basically terrible, but I think that's apretty good point.