In the ethical debate, consequentialism is a normative theory. It holds that action is only right or wrong in virtue of bringing about better consequences. The deontologist believes there are certain actions that might be wrong even if they're good for society. But i think when the deontologist caves in in the face of massive consequences, he has revealed something about his position, says David Cameron.
Sam Harris gets back in the VBW ring for another round on moral responsibility, ethical theories, and the grounds for our obligations to other people. Are we at a genuine stalemate when it comes to blame and desert? Is Tamler a closet consequentialist? Is Sam a closet pluralist? Why is Dave such a big Wagner fan? Plus, Twitter shaming: what is it good for? Settle in, get comfortable, pour yourself a drink, you’re in for the long haul on this one.
Links
Special Guest: Sam Harris.
Support Very Bad Wizards