i don't think that's a strike against the position. I think it just shows that, you know, our philosophical positions are informed by our experiences,. and there's nothing wrong with that. So i mean, you ought not need to become a father in order to actually, i think, find this ti philosopi ugestin. That's what, yes, iundetstand you need it. Like that was like the seed of the change. And so i, i mean, that's the great insight of that paper. And i think people misunderstand it because it's a very complex position. Its right? This is why i think it's not a good way to express