Ah, i find him to be very smart and very slippery. Yes, i think he is a slippery person. I think he refuses to get pinned down on what he's actually arguing, who should do what. And he is also allowing his, i think, fairly benal point about say popular things and avoid issues. That's benall. And democrats already do that. And what he also does is he allows a people with, i think, a very bad intentions to hyjack his argument. And i say allows, because he published on managlasius blog. And i think managlasius position is to adopt

surism

as a means of just telling everyone to his left to shut up, right? I think, i think that's literally what mat wants from it. And, you know, so with, i think, with shore's tacit permission, he is taking a series of a, i think, fairly small scale and not particularly interesting, polling based insights about messaging. And and without ever coming out and saying exactly what he thinks people should be doing, he's using his sort of wank celebrity to allow very annoying people on line to tell everyone else to shut up. And, you know, like you say, the, the the irony here is that the on line. Left has had a version of popular for years, literally for years. And and there their version of it has been to say, the things moderates want to do in office with power are not popular, and instead, here's a whole bunch of leftis priorities, primarily kitchen table economic ones, that are popular, and democrats should do them instead. And exactly as you say, we're now in a position where democrats and power and the incredibly popular kitchen table issues

are being

taken off the table because of moderates who are selected because only someone like them can win in their purple state. So right the wrong people are geting yelled at, and they're geting yelled at by annoying people. That's, that's why this debate is annoying.