2min chapter

Reasons Revisited cover image

HOLDING OUT FOR A ZERO: assessing the UK’s climate progress

Reasons Revisited

CHAPTER

The Impact of the Citizens' Assembly

I think with a lot of public engagement stuff is the government doesn't want to turn up to the conversation. They're kind of hoping people can carry on living their lives and they'll get new technologies. Around flights, for example, people at the government have explicitly said carry on flying as you are. We'll fix this as technology. Food as well, eating meat, government have said they don't want to get involved in that. Is it a good idea? If I was a sectorist state, what would you be advising me that it should cover? I'm practicing open policy thinking here, so I'd be interested in your thoughts. No, I like it. I like it

00:00

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode