The Markets May Not React as Much as They Used to Do Three Months Ago

I think that the markets would have reacted much, much more negatively to a nuclear incident three months ago than now. We've ring fenced the energy risk because it looks like energy reserves in Europe are actually going to be pretty meaningful. The monetary and fiscal implications of that may not be as meaningfully disruptive today as they would have been three months ago. But what do you mean by nuclear incident? You mean a nuke goes off or just a threat? You're saying if Putin blows up a nuke, the markets may not react that much?